Friday, July 17, 2009

What’s all the kerfuffle about “Universal Healthcare”?

Okay, I know I don’t post here often, but I have to say something here about this “Universal Healthcare” hoopla that’s going on in the US as they finally catch on to what the rest of the developed world has known for a LONG time now.

Universal Healthcare is a GOOD thing.

I will note here that my opinions here are primarily related to my experiences in the UK, under the NHS. That being said, let’s begin.

Everyone (And I do mean everyone) is eligible to receive care under the NHS. Poor? You’re covered. Student? You’re covered too. Unemployed? Yup, you’re fine. Working? Sure, you can still take advantage of the NHS. Multi-Millionaire? You can get it too. When we say “Universal”, we mean “Everyone”.

You want a doctor? Go pick one out of the phone book. Need to go to hospital? Call 999 (The UK equivalent of 911), and they’ll take you to the closest one, no charge. Need medicine? If it’s available OTC, just go to your local pharmacy and buy it. If it’s prescription only, go to your doctor. They’ll make sure you actually, medically, need it, and give you a scrip for it. Take that scrip to your pharmacy, pay £8.50 (Around $17), no matter what it is or how many there are, and pick up your drugs. Oh, and if you’re a full-time student, unemployed or retired, you pay nothing. Need to see the optician, or a dentist? That’ll set you back around £30 ($60), unless you’re a student, unemployed or retired, as above, then it’s free. Working with computers? Then your employer is legally required to pay for an eye check-up every 6 months. Need glasses? You can choose NHS-subsidised frames (Generally not the most stylish, but they will certainly do the job), or you can go with a brand-name pair, of which part of the cost may be subsidised.

If you have plenty of money, or if your employer offers it, you can (also) choose to have private medical insurance. So if you need a prescription and you’re working, the insurance takes care of it. If you need a procedure, and the wait time is too long on the NHS, you can choose to have the procedure done in a private hospital on your private medical insurance. And typically, if you elect to have a procedure on the NHS, the private insurance will pay you the equivalent of how much it would have cost to be treated privately.

Doctors on the NHS are incentivised to keep their patients healthy. They get a bonus for things like helping patients quit smoking. In fact, doctors are paid on the quality of life of their patients, not the turnover rate or the cost saved.

It does have to be said, waiting times on the NHS are longer for some non-critical procedures, but as you have the option of going private to avoid that queue, it is a reasonable choice, and certainly better than no care at all.

At no point have I ever had a bureaucrat say “No”. In fact, I have never been refused any kind of medical treatment on the NHS. I’ve never had to wait overlong for a procedure (though in fairness, I’ve never had a life-threatening ailment), and I’ve never had a problem with the care I received.

I know full well it was paid for from the income tax taken from my paycheque, but the amount was never onerous and never left me destitute, and wages were paid well in relation to the job done and the costs involved. Indeed, looking at US wages and the cost of US health plans, an equivalent health plan would cost many times the amount I was paying for the entirety of my income tax.

Universal Healthcare is not socialism, just as a universal police service, or universal fire coverage is not socialism, just like a universal civil defence force (the army/navy/marines/coastguard) is not socialism. It’s the fulfilment of a fundamental human right. It’s the very first one, in fact. “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. So, what’s the problem? And why don’t you have this already?

Friday, June 19, 2009

An opening post

I’ve already got an EV blog, but this one, I think, will be more personal, and/or perhaps related to other ideas that take my attention.

So, to start with, Audiobooks rock. I have an Audible account, but I’ve not bought anything from them for a LONG time. When I was living in Essex and working in London, commuting in by train, it was a very simple matter to load up my Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player (64MB storage! Supporting up to 256MB expansion via Smart Media card!), and listen to a book a week or so being read to me by talented readers, or indeed the author themselves, as I made the hour and a half commute into, and back from work each day.

Now, however, my Rio 500 is lost, along with the cables and the like for it even if I did have it, and I have no finances, nor particular “waste time” to spend listening to books on the go.

However, I have found I can listen to books when I have some downtime here. I can’t listen to books or podcasts and code at the same time (listening to the voice breaks my concentration, whereas music is more of a general surrounding that helps. Odd, I know.), but I can listen when I have to take a break for fresh eyes on a problem.

If I was working and commuting, perhaps I could justify an iPod of some description, or some other PMP that supports Audible format books. But I’m not working right now (Something to do with being an illegal alien), and even when I am working, commuting isn’t going to be that much of a problem, at least around Regina here. This city isn’t big enough to have a long commute to anywhere. Though I suppose if I got work in Moose Jaw, aside from having to have a car and a driver’s license, then I’d have a book-worthy commute.

So, that’s that. Not bad for an opening post, I suppose.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Just watching Tank Girl...

And who's genius idea was it to put a "Let's Do It" number in there? :)

Wednesday, July 5, 2006

Mashups!

I've got to say, I've been following the podcast on this site for a fair while now (It let me grab "Dean Grey"'s "American Edit", one of the best mashup CD's I've yet come across (And now, sadly, hunted down by the *AA and banned from all sites that care to host it)), and while it's a hit-and-miss affair, there's a lot of things in here that work well, and surprise me.

So, go check it out.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

US Congress vs. Videogames

You know, it's shit like this that really gets my goat. Congress really has missed the point.

Let's take an example here. How's this for a plot:
A man, returning from a long trip out of state, is picked up by some corrupt cops, who frame him for a murder to blackmail him into doing various "Dirty Jobs" for them.

He gets home to find his neighborhood overrun with drug dealers and gangs killing his friends and family.

So, as he can't trust the cops, he is forced to take matters into his own hands, cleaning up the streets, taking out the drug dealers, and defending his home from those who would destroy it.

So, while getting used to changes in the city, and making what connections he can to support him cleaning up the town, he ventures out into the world to expose and get rid of the corrupt cops, clean the drugs off the street, and perhaps even find love along the way.

Sounds like the plot for some Hollywood action-thriller, doesn't it?

That's the opening scenario and plot for GTA: San Andreas. Sure, you can go on a rampage and kill hookers for their money, but the point is, and I have to switch to bold for this one, you don't have to! Nowhere within the game do you have to kill a hooker. In fact, the number of plot-required deaths is small (And you have no option with them, what with being blackmailed).

Let's take another example. That old scapegoat, Doom. There, you're on Mars, which has been overrun with hellspawn, and you have but one option. Kill or be killed. It's quite simple, really, just like war.

And let's move on the subject of kids getting games rated too high for them. 9 times out of 10, it's the parents asking the kid "What game do you want, Jimmy?", then buys whatever game Jimmy points to. The shopkeeper can do nothing here, as it's the parent who's buying, and if they point out that the game's not suitable to the parent, most parents are offended. And parents aren't taking responsibility any more. If they can find a scapegoat to blame their child's disfunction on, they will. The fact that they're relying on TV and videogames to care for their children means that they don't know what their child really is like, or is really thinking. They plonk their kid down in front of the TV to shut them up.

It's a good job I'm in Canada, where the state doesn't interfere with things that work just fine.

Thursday, October 24, 2002

And even more delays (almost a whole YEAR, can you believe it?), but finally an update.

And not a very happy one at that. :(

I've been made redundant. Maybe this Blog should be re-named. Who knows.

Ach well, had to happen sooner or later.

Tuesday, December 11, 2001

Well, that's a month (almost exactly) since my last post.

What's changed?

Not much. Germany's being re-written (Again) and there's yet more stuff going on.

Roll on New Year.